Omargeddon pointed out a score I posted was bad evidence and I agreed. LINK
I should has at the very least got a bad reputation for this. I honestly think bad evidence should not be accepted and atleast mark a person down. This proves it does not happen with 100 % pass. I'm disscusted to see this and NOT A SINGLE PERSON can say I earned this score withthe pathetic evidence I provided. That is right I'm attacking my self to attack you people in making bad voting decisions. This is why I stoped voting because I was the main no voter and most the other were actual trolls. I found it unfair for only mine S.BAZ and Vector-Gamer to be making actual real no votes while most things everyone else voted yes. I can not get to all he scores which made a select few get hit with no votes and many other to pass with ease and no mark on their reputation. I can not vote on my own scores so I got a 100% just like hose I missed out on to vote no against.
I know this has not been a topic for a while and it has been calm here which has been nice. So perhaps I'm the thorn in the bush and the problem causer. I bet Vector-Gamer would aprecieate my discust though. As soon as I start voting and posting my honest opinions I useually get shit on. This time I got a critical thinking awsome human being who pointed out I'm human like the rest of you and no better.
Thank you Omargeddon. I'm not being sarcastic. I truly thank you. Together we can bring better evidence to the site not feel bad about no voting while not being held to the standard of twin galixies. We do not need staff reviews of our scores but rather an honest voting system that punishes people for offering terrible evidence.