San Francisco Rush 2049 [Haight] (Dreamcast)

Score: 0:04:17.806

World Ranking: 2

Scored By: kamakazi20012 (MLA)

When: 9-7-2015

100% Legit

San Francisco Rush 2049 [Haight] time of 0:04:17.806

Comments

Hmm...I'm trying to figure out how 4'17.806" is lower than my previous score of 0.00.00. I don't get it.

-- Posted by kamakazi20012 on 2015-09-07 18:42:16 Reply

@kamakazi20012: It does that to me on all my timed entries. Like my f-zero (snes/super famicom) entries today. Idk, but it shouldn't really change anything.

-- Posted by derek on 2015-09-07 19:18:42 Reply

@kamakazi20012:

Maybe times of 0.00.00 don't count because noone can get around a track that slowly. :)

-- Posted by Mark on 2015-09-07 21:32:30 Reply

Please indicate the reason you are voting against this submission:

The submitter will receive your feedback anonymously.

General

Identification: I couldn't tell if the submitter is actually the person who achieved this score.

Legibility: I couldn't read the score in the evidence, or I couldn't see the final score.

Settings: I wanted to see better evidence of the settings of the game, system, or emulator.

Photo

Photo Insufficient: I think a photo alone isn't sufficient evidence for this score. Video desired.

Screenshot: I don't trust screenshots in a case like this. I would rather see a photo taken with a camera.

Video

Partial Recording: I wanted to see video of the entire gameplay. A partial recording made me uncomfortable.

Screen Cam: I don't trust screen capture recordings. I prefer to see video recorded with a camera.

Mistakes

Score Doesn't Match: Score submitted does not match the score shown in the evidence.

Incorrect Categorization: Submitted under the wrong category, game title, or variation.

Fair Play

Wrong Settings: Submitter did not use the correct settings.

Rules: Submitter did not follow High Score's rules.

Tactics: I have an issue with the tactics used to achieve this score.

Cheating: Submitter might have used saves, passwords/codes, cheats/trainers, continues, tampering, etc.

Suspicious Evidence: I believe the evidence could have been doctored or stolen.

Other

Reputation: I don't trust the submitter due to past actions, reputation, or their legit rating.

Other: