Action 52: Thrusters (NES/Famicom Emulated)

Score: 5,975

World Ranking: 3

Scored By: calQlus804 (CAL)

When: 4-9-2017

100% Legit

Comments

Starts at 29:30.

-- Posted by calQlus804 on 2017-04-09 12:50:50 Reply

You actually had the guts to play Action 52? I salute you!

-- Posted by LarcenTyler on 2017-04-12 19:48:14 Reply

Thanks, Larcen! It was...interesting. I may go back for the Cry Baby game some day, but I wanted to give the game a go. It's not that bad...it's just arguably overloaded with filters. They probably could have done 26 games and made them twice as good with a bit more effort and had a bigger hit on their hands.

-- Posted by calQlus804 on 2017-04-13 15:35:14 Reply

vote here...

-- Posted by jmaio on 2017-04-30 14:35:51 Reply

Please indicate the reason you are voting against this submission:

The submitter will receive your feedback anonymously.

General

Identification: I couldn't tell if the submitter is actually the person who achieved this score.

Legibility: I couldn't read the score in the evidence, or I couldn't see the final score.

Settings: I wanted to see better evidence of the settings of the game, system, or emulator.

Photo

Photo Insufficient: I think a photo alone isn't sufficient evidence for this score. Video desired.

Screenshot: I don't trust screenshots in a case like this. I would rather see a photo taken with a camera.

Video

Partial Recording: I wanted to see video of the entire gameplay. A partial recording made me uncomfortable.

Screen Cam: I don't trust screen capture recordings. I prefer to see video recorded with a camera.

Mistakes

Score Doesn't Match: Score submitted does not match the score shown in the evidence.

Incorrect Categorization: Submitted under the wrong category, game title, or variation.

Fair Play

Wrong Settings: Submitter did not use the correct settings.

Rules: Submitter did not follow High Score's rules.

Tactics: I have an issue with the tactics used to achieve this score.

Cheating: Submitter might have used saves, passwords/codes, cheats/trainers, continues, tampering, etc.

Suspicious Evidence: I believe the evidence could have been doctored or stolen.

Other

Reputation: I don't trust the submitter due to past actions, reputation, or their legit rating.

Other: