Super Pac-Man (Arcade Emulated / M.A.M.E.)

Score: 128,590

World Ranking: 6

Scored By: nick666101 (NIC)

When: 8-26-2014

100% Legit

Comments

I was always in the minority of liking this game, especially with the whiners going "it's not Pac-Man! You don't eat dots!" So what? It's more intuiative to unlock doors and all, if you ask me!

-- Posted by DarrylB on 2014-08-26 15:51:19 Reply

Hay nic your a pac-fanatic arent you

-- Posted by thedarkbanshee on 2014-10-13 21:16:46 Reply

@thedarkbanshee:

I like playing it sometimes.

-- Posted by nick666101 on 2014-10-14 01:04:56 Reply

@nick666101:

It is a great game

-- Posted by thedarkbanshee on 2014-10-14 01:38:40 Reply

Please indicate the reason you are voting against this submission:

The submitter will receive your feedback anonymously.

General

Identification: I couldn't tell if the submitter is actually the person who achieved this score.

Legibility: I couldn't read the score in the evidence, or I couldn't see the final score.

Settings: I wanted to see better evidence of the settings of the game, system, or emulator.

Photo

Photo Insufficient: I think a photo alone isn't sufficient evidence for this score. Video desired.

Screenshot: I don't trust screenshots in a case like this. I would rather see a photo taken with a camera.

Video

Partial Recording: I wanted to see video of the entire gameplay. A partial recording made me uncomfortable.

Screen Cam: I don't trust screen capture recordings. I prefer to see video recorded with a camera.

Mistakes

Score Doesn't Match: Score submitted does not match the score shown in the evidence.

Incorrect Categorization: Submitted under the wrong category, game title, or variation.

Fair Play

Wrong Settings: Submitter did not use the correct settings.

Rules: Submitter did not follow High Score's rules.

Tactics: I have an issue with the tactics used to achieve this score.

Cheating: Submitter might have used saves, passwords/codes, cheats/trainers, continues, tampering, etc.

Suspicious Evidence: I believe the evidence could have been doctored or stolen.

Other

Reputation: I don't trust the submitter due to past actions, reputation, or their legit rating.

Other: