Stinger (NES/Famicom)

Score: 1,405,100

World Ranking: 1

Scored By: derek (DJC)

When: 5-26-2015

96% Legit

Comments

Score at 14:12

Weird game, it could probably be considered at "cute'em up" game.

Its pretty fun though.

-- Posted by derek on 2015-05-26 13:38:33 Reply

nice run!

"cute'em up" - that's great I gotta use that

we're currently playing TwinBee in the NES high score club. i never knew til a few days ago, Stinger is the sequel.

-- Posted by S.BAZ on 2015-05-30 22:14:17 Reply

@S.BAZ:

Haha use it all you want but I can't take credit for it; it's actually a legitimate spin off genre of the shmup games. The parodius games are good examples.

-- Posted by derek on 2015-05-30 23:45:43 Reply

@derek:

so I guess Fantasy Zone would be an early one. I wonder what could be considered the original cute 'em up?

-- Posted by S.BAZ on 2015-06-02 00:28:36 Reply

@S.BAZ: I was wondering the same thing, fatasy zone is definitely older.

-- Posted by derek on 2015-06-02 04:42:44 Reply

Please indicate the reason you are voting against this submission:

The submitter will receive your feedback anonymously.

General

Identification: I couldn't tell if the submitter is actually the person who achieved this score.

Legibility: I couldn't read the score in the evidence, or I couldn't see the final score.

Settings: I wanted to see better evidence of the settings of the game, system, or emulator.

Photo

Photo Insufficient: I think a photo alone isn't sufficient evidence for this score. Video desired.

Screenshot: I don't trust screenshots in a case like this. I would rather see a photo taken with a camera.

Video

Partial Recording: I wanted to see video of the entire gameplay. A partial recording made me uncomfortable.

Screen Cam: I don't trust screen capture recordings. I prefer to see video recorded with a camera.

Mistakes

Score Doesn't Match: Score submitted does not match the score shown in the evidence.

Incorrect Categorization: Submitted under the wrong category, game title, or variation.

Fair Play

Wrong Settings: Submitter did not use the correct settings.

Rules: Submitter did not follow High Score's rules.

Tactics: I have an issue with the tactics used to achieve this score.

Cheating: Submitter might have used saves, passwords/codes, cheats/trainers, continues, tampering, etc.

Suspicious Evidence: I believe the evidence could have been doctored or stolen.

Other

Reputation: I don't trust the submitter due to past actions, reputation, or their legit rating.

Other: