After Burner (Sega Master System)

Score: 257,800

World Ranking: 3

Scored By: ichigokurosaki1991 (XXX)

When: 4-18-2015

92% Legit

Comments

I've played that at CyPhaCon 2015 in Lake Charles Civic Center at Lake Charles, Louisiana.

-- Posted by ichigokurosaki1991 on 2015-04-18 22:10:30 Reply

I'm going to have to give this another go too. I have both the SMS (Western) and SMS (Japanese) versions. The J-SMS version is cool because It supports FM sound. While the J-SMS contained the same Texas Instruments SN76489A sound chip that was used in other versions of the SMS, Game Gear, and Genesis/Mega Drive, the J-SMS also contained the Yamaha YM2413, which was also used in an expanision for the MSX.

After Burner for the J-SMS supports the Yamaha chip, which improves the sound a great deal. Anyway ... voting YES!

-- Posted by Mark on 2015-04-18 23:36:51 Reply

Please indicate the reason you are voting against this submission:

The submitter will receive your feedback anonymously.

General

Identification: I couldn't tell if the submitter is actually the person who achieved this score.

Legibility: I couldn't read the score in the evidence, or I couldn't see the final score.

Settings: I wanted to see better evidence of the settings of the game, system, or emulator.

Photo

Photo Insufficient: I think a photo alone isn't sufficient evidence for this score. Video desired.

Screenshot: I don't trust screenshots in a case like this. I would rather see a photo taken with a camera.

Video

Partial Recording: I wanted to see video of the entire gameplay. A partial recording made me uncomfortable.

Screen Cam: I don't trust screen capture recordings. I prefer to see video recorded with a camera.

Mistakes

Score Doesn't Match: Score submitted does not match the score shown in the evidence.

Incorrect Categorization: Submitted under the wrong category, game title, or variation.

Fair Play

Wrong Settings: Submitter did not use the correct settings.

Rules: Submitter did not follow High Score's rules.

Tactics: I have an issue with the tactics used to achieve this score.

Cheating: Submitter might have used saves, passwords/codes, cheats/trainers, continues, tampering, etc.

Suspicious Evidence: I believe the evidence could have been doctored or stolen.

Other

Reputation: I don't trust the submitter due to past actions, reputation, or their legit rating.

Other: